Long have I seen Sankey visualizations. Long have I liked Sankey visualizations. Long have I never known their name.

Though these graphs can overload you on information at first glance, everything is pretty neatly organized when you inspect it more closely. The big bonus of Sankey graphs is how everything is shown and everything is sized proportionally. For large sets that can be broken down into many constituent parts – like everything that generates or uses energy – a Sankey is the way to go.

Sankey graphs lend themselves well to artistic flavor. You can see the “Electricity” block near the top was large enough to fit a drawing of an outlet. Visuals near the residential/commercial/industrial/transportation categories help as well. We all know what they are, but getting a quick visual along with the name of what it’s representing can make it register in our brains much faster.

The key factor of these charts is how everything is shown proportionally. The important factor of data visualization is creating a visual form of data in order to drive home the point being made. In this graph, you can see that there are about 59.4 quads of unused energy. Lots of this is unusable energy, or energy released through reactions, but this visual drives home one point that wouldn’t be as obvious without a visual: we waste a lot of energy when we try to generate energy.

Sankey visualizations are a specialized form of flow diagram that provide a powerful means of illustrating the movement of resources, energy, or information across various entities or stages within a system. Named after the Irish engineer Matthew Sankey, who first used this type of diagram in the late 19th century to depict energy flows, Sankey diagrams have since evolved into a versatile tool applicable in numerous fields.

One of the defining features of Sankey visualizations is their use of arrows whose widths are proportional to the magnitude of the flow they represent. This visual representation allows viewers to quickly grasp the relative sizes of different flows, making it easier to identify significant relationships and distributions within complex systems. For instance, in an energy management context, a Sankey diagram can effectively illustrate how energy is generated, consumed, and lost across various processes, providing insights into efficiency and areas for improvement.

After viewing the data provided by the Sankey visuals, there is plenty of data about energy consumption we can gather from them. The United States imports a small amount of its electricity from Canada and Mexico, mainly from hydroelectric power and fossil fuels. Electricity is called secondary energy as it is generated from primary sources like coal, natural gas, and nuclear power, accounting for about 39% of total U. S. energy supply. In 2015, residential energy use was 21% of total consumption, with major uses being space heating, water heating, space cooling, and lighting. The commercial sector, including offices and stores, consumed 18% of energy, primarily for heating and lighting. The industrial sector used 32% of energy, focusing on energy-intensive industries like refining and paper production. The transportation sector, dominated by oil, consumed 28% of energy to move people and goods.

There are opportunities to improve energy efficiency, though some energy loss as heat is unavoidable. Useful energy refers to the energy that effectively performs tasks like moving a vehicle or heating a space. The total energy consumption in the U. S. is immense, measured in quadrillions of British thermal units (quads), with one quad equal to the annual energy use of a city the size of Chicago.

After learning about Sankey visualizations and the data being represented, I do feel that they are the right visual choice for this data. Sankey visualizations are effective for illustrating data on energy consumption due to their ability to clearly represent the flow of energy between different sources and uses. By employing proportional arrows, these diagrams facilitate an intuitive understanding of how energy is distributed and consumed, allowing for easy identification of trends and inefficiencies. This visual format enhances the comprehension of complex data, making it accessible for analysis and decision-making.

Overall, this presentation was highly informative. The goal of educating people about the total amount of energy being used in the United States through different types of visualizations is very effective. I learned about the different types of energy Americans use every year, how much is wasted, and what types of energy go towards what.

This screenshot above shows that 59.4 out of 98.3 quadrillion btu in 2014 was considered unused energy. That’s over 60% of our total energy. This screenshot also shows the main contributors to our energy supply in the United States with Oil being the number one contributor and natural gas and coal falling not too far behind. The oil used as useful energy primarily is used to power our transportation systems, such as cars, planes, and trains, and then the rest goes into the industrial industry such as factories. The chart also shows which type of energy is used the most with industrial energy having a significant lead over residential, commercial, and transportation.

Overall, I think the biggest thing I learned from this interactive chart is how much energy we waste in the United States. I always knew most countries were not as efficient as possible when using energy, but I never would guess over 60% of generated energy goes unused every year.

One visual aid for showing a flow from one set of data to another is a Sankey diagram. The connections are known as links, and the objects that are linked are known as nodes. Comparing quantities at various levels is done via Sankey diagrams. Among other things, they are able to display budgets, financial outcomes, the narrative of an application process, multi-round elections, and more. On the website Our Energy System, it shows you the flow of energy in the United States. The sankey visualization is very pleasing to the eye and I like how each different type of energy has more information and each word you can click on it and it will give you brief facts about the use of energy in the United States.

Here is the sankey visualization:

As you can see they have a different color for each electricity we use in America. Then they go into another section where they give you more information. Ans then they give you the whole scale on how much energy we actually use. I also like the visualizations like the icons they used. There are also other in-depth energy systems one this website that you can use. Every single word on this sankey visualization you can click and give you more information. This is really cool and I don’t think I ever seen this type of visualization, but it is very useful and probably be using this in the future.

Introduction

The Country Health Trends Dataset sourced from Kaggle provides key indicators such as life expectancy, fertility rate, population, and regional classifications for countries worldwide. This data allows researchers to explore global development trends, perform comparative analysis across regions, and investigate correlations between health and socioeconomic factors. This report provides a statistical overview and analysis of these indicators, uncovering insights into global health disparities and patterns across regions.

Objectives

The main objectives of this analysis are as follows:

1. Perform Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) to understand the distribution and range of key indicators.
2. Conduct comparative analysis across regions for life expectancy and fertility rate.
3. Explore correlations between life expectancy and fertility rate.
4. Visualize global life expectancy using an interactive map.
5. Highlight population distribution by region.

Data Overview

The dataset contains the following columns:

• Country: Name of the country or territory.
• Life Expectancy: Average years a newborn is expected to live if current mortality rates continue.
• Fertility Rate: Average number of children a woman would have over her lifetime.
• Population: Total population of the country.
• Region: Geographical region or political classification of each country.

Data Summary:

• Total Entries: 191
• Regions Represented: Six main regions, including America, Europe & Central Asia, East Asia & Pacific, Middle East & North Africa, South Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa.

Methodology

1. Data Cleaning and Preparation:
   • Checked and handled missing values.
   • Prepared the data for region-wise analysis by grouping and summarizing statistics for each region.
2. Summary Statistics by Region:
   • Calculated the mean, median, minimum, and maximum for life expectancy and fertility rate across each region.
   • Aggregated population data to determine total and average population for each region.
3. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA):
   • Visualized the distribution of life expectancy and fertility rates to understand skewness and distribution patterns.
   • Created box plots to compare life expectancy and fertility rate across regions.
   • Constructed scatter plots to assess relationships between life expectancy, fertility rate, and population size.
4. Correlation Analysis:
   • Used Pearson correlation to evaluate the relationship between life expectancy and fertility rate.
5. Geospatial and Population Visualizations:
   • Developed an interactive world map of life expectancy by country.
   • Plotted a bar chart showing population distribution by region.

Key Findings

Regional Summary of Life Expectancy and Fertility Rate

• Life Expectancy:
  • The highest average life expectancies are observed in America (73.2 years) and Middle East & North Africa (72.8 years), while the lowest is found in Sub-Saharan Africa (56.5 years).
• Fertility Rate:
  • Regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa exhibit significantly higher fertility rates (average 5.4), while Europe & Central Asia show the lowest rates (average 1.7).
• Population:
  • South Asia leads in total population, suggesting higher resource needs, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa and Europe & Central Asia.

Distribution Analysis

• Life Expectancy Distribution:

• The life expectancy distribution displays a negative skew, indicating that most countries have higher life expectancies, with a few outliers on the lower side.
• Fertility Rate Distribution:

• Fertility rate has a positive skew, with several countries displaying high fertility rates, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Comparative Analysis of Life Expectancy and Fertility Rate by Region

• Life Expectancy:

• A box plot reveals that America and Middle East & North Africa have relatively higher and more consistent life expectancy values.
• Sub-Saharan Africa shows both the lowest median and broader range, indicating variability in healthcare and socioeconomic conditions.
• Fertility Rate:

• Fertility rates are notably high in Sub-Saharan Africa, while Europe & Central Asia consistently exhibit low fertility, aligning with trends in more economically developed regions.

Correlation Analysis: Life Expectancy vs. Fertility Rate

• A negative correlation (Pearson’s r = -0.85) was observed between life expectancy and fertility rate, suggesting that higher fertility rates tend to coincide with lower life expectancy. This pattern aligns with demographic transition models, where lower fertility rates are often seen in countries with higher life expectancy due to improved healthcare and economic conditions.

Geospatial Analysis of Life Expectancy

• A map highlights countries with high life expectancies, including Iceland, Sweden, Canada, and Spain. This visualization reveals stark contrasts across regions, particularly between developed nations and regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa.

Population Distribution by Region

• A bar chart indicates that South Asia holds the largest population, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa and Europe & Central Asia. This regional breakdown emphasizes the need for tailored health policies in densely populated areas to address specific regional health challenges.

Conclusion

This analysis of global health and socioeconomic data reveals significant disparities in life expectancy and fertility rates across regions. A clear inverse relationship exists between life expectancy and fertility rate, aligning with global health and economic development patterns. The regional comparisons underscore the influence of socioeconomic factors, with Sub-Saharan Africa facing unique challenges related to high fertility rates and lower life expectancies, while regions like America and Europe & Central Asia exhibit higher life expectancy and lower fertility rates.

Recommendations for Further Analysis

1. Time-Series Analysis: Examining trends over time would allow for tracking progress in life expectancy and fertility rates.
2. Income and Education Analysis: Adding these variables could clarify the socioeconomic factors influencing life expectancy and fertility rates.
3. Policy Impact Study: Assessing the effect of health policies on life expectancy and fertility rate changes across regions could provide actionable insights for policymakers.

Through this highly-informative presentation, the tools used to create these visualizations were very impactful in the goal of educating people about energy issues throughout the United States. In this visualization, I learned about the amount of energy wasted each year, how it impacts us, and what are the main contributors to creating our energy that is used either for commercial, industrial, or residential lifestyles.

In this screenshot, it is shown what are the main contributors to our total energy supply, and what industries rely on what types of energy. For example, it is shown that roughly 20 percent of the total energy created by oil goes to the industrial industry, and most of oil helps fuel the energy needs of the transportation sector. This visualization is very interactive and helps keep readers engaged throughout.

Something that I had learned by going through this visualization, is how much energy is wasted each year, which is well over half of the total supply! Aside from the environmental impact of this situation, which is all very well known and highly covered through various news sources, I was unable to find the financial burden this leaves the country with. A process this inefficient must be incredibly burdening to the people paying for this, which as South Jersey residents, I think everyone can understand.

I want to further explore how this can relate to continuous price hike that many New Jersey residents are facing right now, specifically South Jersey residents. With Atlantic City Electric increasing electric bills by a mind-boggling 20% just last year, I wonder if the situation we are currently viewing through the Sankey visualization can help explain these egregious price hikes.

National Academies Presents: What You Need to Know About Energy (nas.edu)

Sankey Visualizations was a really well displayed and organized site not only explaining what Energy sources are, what it means, and how we can better improve the American Energy Standard. “The energy choices we make shape not only our quality of life, but the health of the environment, how we work and play, the strength of our economy, and our national security”. This site has different links (tabs) the viewer can click on to toggle between How we use our Energy, Energy Sources, The cost, and Energy Efficiency. I drew arrows below on the screenshot to indicate which tabs I am referring to.

Then it breaks down even further how the Energy we use correlates from where it comes from and into percentages as well. Residentual and commercial ( aka our homes and work palces) accounts for 40% of energy consumed in the US according to a 2015 record. Transportation consumes about 28% and us Americans sure do like to Go Go Go. Then the third breakdown goes to Industry which accounts for 32% of energy.

The most significant section of this site is the “Cost of Energy” link. At first I thought it was going to show information about what Energy is taking from the American pocket since it is well known that we use so much of it. This is more focused on stressing the fact that we as human beings are deplesting our source of energy from the Earth faster than we are replacing it. We are using up our plant and fossil fuels more and more as time goes on. “At present, oil accounts for 36% of total energy consumption in the United States. Coal provides 18% and natural gas provides 29% of our energy. Another 9% comes from nuclear power plants. Renewable energy sources round out the roster, accounting for 10% of consumption—mostly as the result of hydropower  investments made in the past century and the use of biomass (organic matter such as wood, municipal waste, and agricultural crops) for fuel and electricity production”.

It is clear that we need Energy sources to continue on living, but this will not be the case if we continue living the way we are. Changes need to be made. And changes need to be made fast. This Sankey Visualization and site did a great job of displaying the content and statistics of Energy. The truths, the reality, and the dangers.